Wikipedia:Requests for page protection
| Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here. | ||
|---|---|---|
|
Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection) After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:ProtectedPages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.
Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here | ||
|
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 |
Current requests for increase in protection level
Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – ARBPIA. PlotinusEnjoyer (talk) 21:31, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 04:11, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: The "Lucky Bisht" page was previously semi-protected due to persistent vandalism and disruptive edits by new and unregistered users. However, the protection has now been removed and the page is once again facing malicious edits. I request that the semi-protection (or extended-confirmed protection) be re-applied to preserve the integrity and reliability of the content.Spider1217 (talk) 21:47, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 01:20, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: A lot of other "Sonic" related article have semi-protection-we should add it to this one as there is a lot of vandalism and unsourced information, and to connect the protection of there 'Sonic" real articles. 2601:243:2100:5AC0:2C45:C2C7:B574:8AB1 (talk) 23:33, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of persistent IP vandalism. Post expiry of recent temporary protection. Senapatiji (talk) 🏴☠️ 01:49, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of persistent IP vandalism post-expiry of recent temporary protection. Senapatiji (talk) 🏴☠️ 01:51, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – The BLP violations amount to vandalism. JFHJr (㊟) 03:39, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Remsense ‥ 论 04:08, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Immediate resume of same editing behaviours leading to previous page protection. livelikemusic (TALK!) 04:20, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: The protection is no longer necessary as there has not been any edit wars or disruptive editing for 15 years. last year, I requested that this page be unprotected and an Admin promised, but I never heard back from them which upset me a lot and made me very angry. if you don't want to unprotect it, then provide a reason why, but don't leave me hanging. 70.53.89.38 (talk) 04:10, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
- For what it is worth, I find it likely other things got shoved in the admin's lap; I agree this is a case for trying unprotection. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 05:30, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
- JBW, as the administrator who indefinitely semi-protected this page on 5 November 2010, would you consider unprotecting it? — Newslinger talk 05:54, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
- The previous unprotection request is at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2024/07 § Arash (singer). Although the request was approved, it looks like something slipped through and the article did not get unprotected. — Newslinger talk 06:10, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
- In response to the earlier request I said, both here and on the talk page of the IP address that submitted the request, that I had removed protection, but in fact I hadn't. Evidently I made some mistake; I've now removed protection. JBW (talk) 19:09, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Section to Edit: Legacy (currently underdeveloped) Proposed New Subsection Title: “Cultural and Academic Impact” Why: Although the Oasis (band) Wikipedia entry covers the band’s biography, discography, and commercial success in detail, the Legacy section lacks a comprehensive analysis of the band’s deeper cultural and academic significance. As one of the most influential bands of the 1990s, Oasis shaped not just music but also British identity, fashion, masculinity, and class politics. Since their emergence in the early 1990s, Oasis have been credited not only with defining the sound of Britpop but also with shaping post-Thatcher working-class identity in Britain. Scholars have interpreted their influence as extending far beyond music into cultural, political, and academic discourse. Music sociologist Andy Bennett describes Oasis as "the sonic voice of Northern pride in a time of cultural centralization" (Bennett, 2001). Their use of regional accents, lyrical themes, and public personas resonated with disaffected youth, especially in industrial cities. The band’s fashion—parkas, trainers, and mod haircuts—helped solidify a subcultural identity later studied in fashion sociology (Woodward, 2009). Academic analyses have also focused on their gender performance and stage dynamics. Neil Nehring suggests that Liam Gallagher’s performance style mixed rebellion and introspection, presenting a hybrid form of postmodern masculinity (Nehring, 1997). Meanwhile, Noel Gallagher’s songwriting has been the subject of literary analysis, with researchers noting his use of anthemic choruses and nostalgic lyricism as devices of collective memory (Shuker, 2001). Historian Keith Gildart contends that Oasis embodied the voice of post-industrial, working-class youth in Britain. Their music captured everyday realities and aspirations, fostering a deep cultural resonance that contributed to the band's enduring nostalgic value for a generation that came of age during significant social and economic transformation (Gildart, 2013). Their albums—especially (What’s the Story) Morning Glory? —are often cited in academic literature about emotional resonance and branding in music (Frith, 1996). The band's influence has also entered formal education. Oasis lyrics have been featured in cultural studies and sociolinguistics syllabi, often analyzed for their representation of urban vernacular and social class. This academic presence reflects a broader recognition of the band as more than entertainment: a cultural artifact worthy of critical inquiry. [1] Bennett, Andy. Cultures of Popular Music. Open University Press, 2001. [2] Shuker, Roy. Understanding Popular Music. Routledge, 2001. [3] Frith, Simon. Performing Rites: On the Value of Popular Music. Harvard University Press, 1996. [4] Nehring, Neil. Popular Music, Gender, and Postmodernism: Anger Is an Energy. SAGE Publications, 1997. [5] Gildart, Keith. Images of England Through Popular Music: Class, Youth and Rock 'n' Roll, 1955–1976. Palgrave Macmillan, 2013. [6] Woodward, Sophie. “The Myth of Street Style.” Fashion Theory, vol. 13, no. 1, 2009, pp. 83–102.
Derdache (talk) 01:43, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Not done - An edit this extensive should be discussed at Talk:Oasis (band), which is not protected. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 02:25, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Handled requests
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.